After successful fundings for female-founded products like GoldieBlox, Roominate, Everpurse and OUYA, we wonder what are the reasons behind rocketship successes and quiet failures.
By Angie Chang (Co-Founder & Editor-in-Chief, Women 2.0)
Recently, a Kauffman Foundation dissertation fellow released a paper titled “The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: Determinants of Success and Failure” examined almost 47,000 projects on Kickstarter which raised $198 million total via crowdfunding.
The paper reports 6 commonalities in the successful Kickstarter projects, some more obvious than others:
- Size of the founder’s social network – The greater the size of the founder’s social network, the greater the chance for success. This is particularly applicable to Facebook. So the “be popular” strategy does work!
- Quality of the project – High-quality, polished pitches are more likely to be funded. As Kickstarter’s website states, “Projects with videos succeed at a much higher rate than those without.”
- Geographic component tie-in – Having a strong geographic component tie-in seems to increase success. For example, Kickstart country music in Nashville, Kickstart film in Los Angeles, etc.
- Shorter Kickstarter durations are better – You have a 35% chance of success for 30-day pitches, versus a 29% chance for 60-day pitches). A longer duration implies a lack of confidence in the project’s success.
- Get highlighted on the Kickstarter website. Being highlighted on the Kickstarter website is hugely beneficial, resulting in 89% chance of success vs. 30% success of unfeatured projects.
- Target the creative community. – A large number of creative individuals in the city where the project is based is associated with greater success (target these kinds of people).
Women 2.0 readers: Have you run a Kickstarter project recently? Was it funded or not? Let us know in the comments below!

